Article PDF first page preview

Article PDF first page preview

Introduction: To examine the opinions of urology specialists on whether there are actual differences in efficacy among α1-blockers and to identify the factors that should be considered when prescribing these medications according to age. Methods: We surveyed 50 South Korean urology specialists with over 3 years of clinical experience in secondary or tertiary hospitals in July-August 2021. The survey covered urologists' demographics, awareness of α1-blocker prescription differences, and key factors in α1-blocker selection based on LUTS severity and patient age. Results: Overall, 82% of the respondents believed that there were differences in efficacy of α1-blockers in actual practice according to age. Over 90% of the respondents agreed on the need for head-to-head comparison studies to compare the effects of different α1-blockers. Regardless of the severity of LUTS, urologists prioritize cardiovascular side effects when prescribing α1-blockers to patients aged ≥70 years. Further, 19% of the urologists prioritized ejaculatory side effects for mild-to-moderate LUTS and 9% for severe LUTS (p < 0.001). Conclusions: This study shows that head-to-head studies comparing the efficacy of different α1-blockers are highly valuable for the real-world clinical application of α1-blockers. Notably, urologists prioritize cardiovascular and ejaculatory side effects in older and younger patients while prescribing α1-blockers, respectively.

Journal Section:
Research Article
This content is only available via PDF.
S. Karger AG, Basel
Copyright / Drug Dosage / Disclaimer
Copyright: All rights reserved. No part of this publication may be translated into other languages, reproduced or utilized in any form or by any means, electronic or mechanical, including photocopying, recording, microcopying, or by any information storage and retrieval system, without permission in writing from the publisher.
Drug Dosage: The authors and the publisher have exerted every effort to ensure that drug selection and dosage set forth in this text are in accord with current recommendations and practice at the time of publication. However, in view of ongoing research, changes in government regulations, and the constant flow of information relating to drug therapy and drug reactions, the reader is urged to check the package insert for each drug for any changes in indications and dosage and for added warnings and precautions. This is particularly important when the recommended agent is a new and/or infrequently employed drug.
Disclaimer: The statements, opinions and data contained in this publication are solely those of the individual authors and contributors and not of the publishers and the editor(s). The appearance of advertisements or/and product references in the publication is not a warranty, endorsement, or approval of the products or services advertised or of their effectiveness, quality or safety. The publisher and the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to persons or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content or advertisements.
2024
You do not currently have access to this content.